
Subject:
[cohp] Digest Number 5365
From:
cohp@yahoogroups.com
Date:
8/14/2016 2:01 AM
To:
cohp@yahoogroups.com
X-Account-Key:
account2
X-UIDL:
GmailId1568848de9499de8
X-Mozilla-Status:
0001
X-Mozilla-Status2:
00000000
Delivered-To:
oldadit@gmail.com
Received:
by 10.200.45.133 with SMTP id p5csp819296qta; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 02:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received:
by 10.66.197.195 with SMTP id iw3mr42874914pac.82.1471165292080; Sun, 14 Aug 2016 02:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path:
<sentto-346088-5365-1471165290-oldadit=gmail.com@returns.groups.yahoo.com>
Received:
from ng21-vm5.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (ng21-vm5.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com. [67.195.87.99]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f5si19877573pas.31.2016.08.14.02.01.31 for <oldadit@gmail.com> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 14 Aug 2016 02:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF:
pass (google.com: domain of sentto-346088-5365-1471165290-oldadit=gmail.com@returns.groups.yahoo.com designates 67.195.87.99 as permitted sender) client-ip=67.195.87.99;
Authentication-Results:
mx.google.com; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@yahoogroups.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sentto-346088-5365-1471165290-oldadit=gmail.com@returns.groups.yahoo.com designates 67.195.87.99 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sentto-346088-5365-1471165290-oldadit=gmail.com@returns.groups.yahoo.com; dmarc=fail (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=yahoogroups.com
DKIM-Signature:
v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1471165291; bh=zmfZyFrXfVHnagH1UeK4Z/4e+thKR8OZwUWNJlSFgTI=; h=List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:Date:From:To:Subject:Reply-To:From:Subject; b=yNeagp3NIDw/9Px5qXVPA3Q4W86k3umjogbsTCMMEjtgNXY1WoHF7yVhgXNYFcPL2sxep6Gztdv1/5yiJHTV0CpZK7Mk+woZv/ZmkHhRIJCBBvN5Y2tBb8oP9wnr9aDX38x84G03+jx1FCxYvRDlFLqHpwnmFTZfQJawxPf+4+8=
Received:
from [98.137.0.81] by ng21.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Aug 2016 09:01:31 -0000
Received:
from [10.193.39.8] by tg10.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Aug 2016 09:01:31 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:
346088-d5365
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
<1471165290.168.31408.m7@yahoogroups.com>
Mailing-List:
list cohp@yahoogroups.com; contact cohp-owner@yahoogroups.com
Delivered-To:
mailing list cohp@yahoogroups.com
List-Id:
<cohp.yahoogroups.com>
Precedence:
bulk
List-Unsubscribe:
<mailto:cohp-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:
groups-digest-ff-m
Reply-To:
"No Reply"<notify-dg-cohp@yahoogroups.com>
Content-Type:
text/html
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit

County High Pointing in all 50 states
Yahoo! Groups
County High Pointing in all 50 states Group
1 Message
Digest #5365
1
Harney Peak -> Black Elk Peak by powdrfox

Message
1
Harney Peak -> Black Elk Peak
Sat Aug 13, 2016 2:50 pm (PDT) . Posted by:
powdrfox
http://rapidcityjournal.com/news/local/federal-board-renames-harney-peak-to-black-elk-peak/article_a89119e6-bb3e-50e7-a8d8-787d98d50286.html http://rapidcityjournal.com/news/local/federal-board-renames-harney-peak-to-black-elk-peak/article_a89119e6-bb3e-50e7-a8d8-787d98d50286.html
Looks like another big name change for a state highpoint. Does this mean that we all have to revisit it? And for that matter, do all of you mountaineers need to revisit Denali (or not because "Denali" already had state level recognition)?


Reply to sender . Reply to group . Reply via Web Post . All Messages (1) . Top ^
Visit Your Group

    New Members 1

Yahoo! Groups
 Privacy  Unsubscribe  Terms of Use
